Guest
🛒 Get the Yamaha P225 ▸ 🛒 Get the Roland FP-30X ▸ 🛒 See More Yamaha Digital Pianos▸ 🛒 See More Roland Digital Pianos▸ 💕 Subscribe to Merriam Pianos HERE ▸ 🔔 Click the 🔔 bell to be notified of all videos! ▸ Alternative Options - Comparable Digital Pianos 🛒 Roland FP-60X ▸ 🛒 Kawai ES120 ▸ 🛒 Yamaha P125 ▸ 🛒 Kawai ES920 ▸ 🛒 Korg B2 ▸ 🛒 Yamaha P-45 ▸ 🛒 Yamaha DGX-660 ▸ 🛒 Yamaha YPG-535 ▸ #yamahap225 #rolandfp30x #digitalpiano #rolanddigitalpiano #yamahadigitalpiano Welcome to our in-depth comparison of the Yamaha P-225 and the Roland FP-30X digital pianos. In this video, we'll break down the key features, specs, and differences between these two popular models to help you make an informed decision on your next digital piano purchase. 🎹 Specs 🎹 Yamaha P-225: 192-note polyphony CFX Sound Engine with a single resonance engine 4 Speaker, 14 Watt System (2 rear-facing speakers and 2 forward-facing tweeters) 24 onboard sounds USB Audio Interface for two-way audio with a computer Onboard Audio Accompaniment with 20 rhythm styles Yamaha Remote App compatibility Slimmer and lighter design Grand Hammer Compact (GHC) action Roland FP-30X: 256-note polyphony 56 onboard sounds 22 Watts of speaker power PHA-4 Action with escapement simulation and triple sensor Both keyboards feature wireless connectivity, but the Roland offers Bluetooth audio and Bluetooth MIDI, while the Yamaha supports Bluetooth audio only. They both come with dual ¼” outputs for PA system integration. 🎹 Action 🎹 The Yamaha GHC action offers a solid and well-cushioned feel, with a more compact keystick compared to the GHS action. The Roland PHA-4 action, on the other hand, includes escapement simulation and a triple sensor for enhanced accuracy, making it a better choice for advanced players. 🎹 Cost Difference 🎹 The primary cost difference between these pianos is the action. The PHA-4 action in the Roland FP-30X is more expensive to produce than the GHC action in the Yamaha P-225. 🎹 Tone 🎹 The difference in tone can be attributed to the different piano models they're based on. The Roland uses the Steinway D, offering more midrange prominence and less treble brightness. The Yamaha uses the CFX, providing a cleaner, brighter, and tighter sound. The Roland has a wider dynamic range, allowing for darker and brighter tones. 🎹 Speakers 🎹 The P-225's rear-facing speakers project sound to the audience but may not match what the player hears due to the lack of downward-facing or player-facing speakers. The Roland relies on sound reflection off the floor, resulting in warmth and better bass response. 🎹 Audio Source 🎹 Both pianos sound similar at lower volumes, but differences emerge as the dynamic range increases. Yamaha's mellow tone shines at quieter volumes, while the differences become noticeable in the upper range at higher volumes. 🎹 Features 🎹 Yamaha retains its valuable rhythm accompaniment feature, while the FP-30X offers a similar feature through the Roland app. Both models have EQ options for room positioning, but Yamaha adds a sound booster for compression control. In conclusion, your choice between these models depends on your experience level and usage preferences. Advanced players may prefer the Roland FP-30X for its superior action, while beginners will find both options suitable. Consider whether you'll use headphones or speakers primarily and compare them side by side for the best fit. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit that notification bell for more informative piano comparisons and reviews! Thank you for watching! 🎶🎹
