Guest
From the early days of SpaceX, the company's relationship with the FAA has been, to put it mildly, Turbulent. The early days were marked by numerous disagreements, with SpaceX facing fines on multiple occasions for failing to meet regulatory requirements. space enthusiasts will undoubtedly recall the bureaucratic hoops SpaceX had to jump through for the first Starship launch license. And now, history seems to be repeating itself as the battle for the green light for Starship's second flight ensues. But the latest disagreement between the two entities isn't about Starship. Instead, it revolves around a contentious FAA report concerning space debris. SpaceX was clearly unhappy with the findings of that report. The current atmosphere between them can best be described as ' Tense.' Before we delve further into this unfolding drama, take a moment to subscribe to our channel. Stay in the loop with the latest news on the Starship and other groundbreaking SpaceX missions. This whole situation began when the FAA put out a report that raised many eyebrows. They warned about space junk dangers from satellites in low Earth orbit by 2035. The gist of it? If all the planned satellites are sent up, falling space junk might hurt or even kill someone on Earth every two years. Reading between the lines, the report indirectly points fingers at SpaceX, given their ambitious plans for the Starlink satellite constellation. The FAA estimates a staggering 28,000 hazardous fragments from de-orbiting satellites and their associated rockets could survive reentry by 2035. These numbers, alarmingly, align with SpaceX's aggressive Starlink expansion strategy. SpaceX, in recent history since 2019, has already launched 5,000 Starlink satellites. With the green light from the FCC, their target is set for 12,000 satellites. But that's not all. They're eyeing global permissions to have an astounding 40,000 Starlinks orbiting our planet. Given the implications, SpaceX is, understandably, on the defensive. David Goldstein, a principal engineer at SpaceX, didn't mince words. In an Oct. 9 letter addressed to both the FAA and Congress, he criticized the report, calling it a product of “deeply flawed analysis“ that leans heavily on assumptions, guesswork, and outdated studies. The undertone was clear: the company believes it's being unfairly targeted and is prepared to challenge the findings. Keywords:- Spacex starship and FAA, FAA Starship, new Starship launch, SpaceX raptor engines, raptor 2 and raptor 3 engines, when is starship launching, Starship second launch, FAA starship license, Second starship launch, starship 33 engines fire, starship upgrade, Starship fully stacked, starship second launch, FAA approved starship, FAA and spacex starship, second starship launch
