Because Roy and Wes Anderson's aesthetics are so jarringly different from most films, they take precedence in so many of the conversations about their work. Instead, I wanted to talk about how those different styles of exaggeration and artificiality are actually utilised to convey ideas that conventional aesthetics can’t. Please consider supporting the channel on Patreon so I can keep making videos like these. If you don't, I might die: Follow on Facebook: Follow on Twitter: Online Sources : “LIVE from the NYPL: Wes Anderson | Paul Holdengräber“: äber “PEN festival 2014 - The Impossible Exile: Stefan Zweig at the End of the World“: David Bordwell's “Shot-consciousness“: “Roy Andersson’s Cinematic Poetry and the Spectre of César Vallejo“: “Roy Andersson: ‘I’m trying to show what it’s like to be human’ “: “Roy Andersson Talks Finishing a Trilogy, Artistic Support, and Bergman’s Battle with God“ “THE “TRIVIALIST CINEMA” OF ROY ANDERSSON: AN INTERVIEW “: I do not own the rights of the movies used for this video, though I do believe they fall under the Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, which states that for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research, it becomes fair use... bitch!
Hide player controls
Hide resume playing