A Response to SciAm's 'Stop Using Phony Science to Justify Transphobia'

The Scientific American blog article 'Stop Using Phony Science to Justify Transphobia' is another piece which uses the complexities of sex development and the diversity of sex differences to argue that sex is not binary. Let's analyze the argument with peer-reviewed science. Transcripts, sources, and membership at: Read the Scientific American blog article here: Sources: [1] Inoubli, A., et al. (2011). Karyotyping: Is It Worthwhile in Transsexualism? The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(2). [2] Sax, L. (2002). How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research. [3] Gilbert, SF. (2000). Chromosomal sex determination in mammals. Developmental Biology, 6th edition. Sunderland (MA), Sinauer Associates. [4] Kimball, J. (2020). Sex chromosomes. . [5] Kashimada, K., Koopman, P. (2010). Sry, the master switch in mammalian sex determinat