PRO: Hernando de Sota and Dambisa Moyo v. CON: Stephen Lewis and Paul Collier In a world where over 3 billion people live on under $2 a day, where economies and threats are globally interconnected, and where only small amounts of aid are given, should wealthy nations do more? Or, given the poor track record of aid, the support it provides to dictators and tyrants, and the actual need for individual entrepreneurialism and free markets, should we focus our limited resources elsewhere? The third Munk Debate explored the opportunities and hazards of foreign aid, by debating the question: Is foreign aid doing more harm than good?
Hide player controls
Hide resume playing