Guest
YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if the official story adequately addressed the issue using the scientific method. (see more) The direction and sequence of the primary forces to create the smooth motions observed in the towers destruction had to be “out and down“. The official story is impossible because if it was “down then out” by gravity alone, there would have been impacts or jolts slowing or stopping the downward motion. The DIRECTION of acceleration for any two (or more) objects is INDEPENDENT of mass, material, size and scale, and always in line with the applied net force. The SEQUENCE of forces acting on any two groups of accelerating objects is also INDEPENDENT of mass, material, size and scale. If one can mimic the motions observed on a large group of objects with a series of forces applied to any small group of objects, then then larger group of objects, regardless of its mass, material, size and scale will have the same sequence and direction of net forces as the smaller group. The motions of dissimilar small objects are used frequently to demonstrate the motions and forces acting on very large objects because the direction and sequence of net force on both are independent of mass, material, size and scale. For example, the direction of acceleration and therefore direction of net force acting on a bucket tied to a rope whirled around your head, is similar to the motion and direction of net force acting on our moon orbiting the earth. The direction of acceleration due to the net force acting on both the bucket and the moon are similar, even though the bucket is not a scaled model of our moon. No agency, no expert, no scientist, nobody has ever been able to make any real model demonstrating the forces necessary to mimic the smooth downward and outward accelerations observed during the twin towers fall using gravity and fire alone, because it's impossible.
